This present case was filed by Polo Lauren Company L.P. (“Polo”) against Landmark Traders and Mystic Emin Private Ltd. (“Defendants”) before the Delhi District Court (“the Court”) alleging trademark ...

The present Appeal was filed by the M/s The Southern India Exporting Company (“SIECO”), against M/s The Classic Fireworks Industries (“Classic Fireworks”), challenging an order passed by the Deputy ...

The Madras High Court resolved a trademark dispute between M/s. The Southern India Exporting Company and M/s. The Classic Fireworks Industries, ruling that the ‘Eagle’ mark held prior rights over ...

The Madras High Court reversed the Registrar of Trade Marks’ decision to refuse KX Technologies LLC’s application for the FACT trademark for air and water purification filters. The court found no ...

This case involves a dispute between Nobroker Technologies Solution Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) and Notbroker Property Management (Defendant). Nobroker sought a perpetual injunction against Notbroker, ...

The Delhi High Court issued a permanent injunction in favor of Tata Sons, preventing the use of trademarks and trade dress similar to “TATA COPPER+ WATER.” The defendant ceased infringement and ...

In a trademark infringement and passing-off suit filed by M/S. Cothas Coffee Co. (“Cothas Coffee”) against M/S. Cotha Associates and others (collectively “the Defendants”), the XVIII Additional City ...

In the case of Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. v. Mohan Kumar Kotana, the Delhi High Court granted a decree of permanent injunction in favor of Tata Sons, restraining the defendant from using ...

25. OPPOSITION TO THE PATENT. 26. IN CASES OF “OBTAINING” CONTROLLER MAY TREAT THE PATENT AS THE PATENT OF OPPONENT. 27. REFUSAL TO PATENT WITHOUT OPPOSITION. 28. MENTION OF INVENTOR AS SUCH IN PATENT ...

(1) The Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks appointed under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (43 of 1958) shall be the Controller of Designs ...

The Madras High Court dismissed Monster Energy’s appeal against the refusal to register “Energy for the Journey” as a trademark, citing lack of distinctiveness. The Court upheld that generic or ...

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions in favor of Hindware Limited, restraining the Defendants from infringing Hindware’s trademarks and registered design. This landmark ruling underscores ...